A discussion on research philosophy and plan of action

The principle of reflective critique ensures people reflect on issues and processes and make explicit the interpretations, biases, assumptions and concerns upon which judgments are made.

Gain a thorough understanding of the body on knowledge before starting further research. Action research also starts with the rational process of deciding on the type of problem to address. Voice 61 7 Fax 61 7 Email p.

To improve the human condition by changing the situation. This plural structure of inquiry requires a plural text for reporting. Value choice answer of the scientific paradigm.

If the H1 does not fit the current body of knowledge the results may or may not be published. Paradigm of Praxis Though sharing a number of perspectives with the interpretive paradigm, and making considerable use of its related qualitative methodologies, there are some researchers who feel that neither it nor the positivist paradigms are sufficient epistemological structures under which to place action research LatherMorley The community is integral in planning, implementing and evaluating.

A report, therefore, acts as a support for ongoing discussion among collaborators, rather than a final conclusion of fact.

Writing a Discussion Section

Value choice answers of action research to problem 4. Action research is another combination of empirical and rational procedures. Stephen Kemmis has developed a simple model of the cyclical nature of the typical action research process Figure 1.

Treat the world as separate to the researcher, i.

Action research tends, but is not necessarily, participative and dealing with qualitative data. Mostly, though, in accordance with its principles, it is chosen when circumstances require flexibility, the involvement of the people in the research, or change must take place quickly or holistically.

Use techniques to find common and idiosyncratic perceptions. There are two classical epistemological positions and both are concerned about the relationship of our mind to our experience in generating knowledge. This stage of critical reflection searches for both confirming and disconfirming evidence.

The assumptions behind paradigms of inquiry are not logically defendable, therefore it is not possible to decide which paradigm is more logical than another.

Eric Trist, another major contributor to the field from that immediate post-war era, was a social psychiatrist whose group at the Tavistock Institute of Human Relations in London engaged in applied social research, initially for the civil repatriation of German prisoners of war.

Both were avid proponents of the principle that decisions are best implemented by those who help make them. If the Ho is not falsified, there tends to be a decision not publish but to loop back to the stage of developing a testable theory.

Purposeful human behaviour to change the situation is the aim of the inquiry so overdetermine this outcome with multiple strategies. There are, I think, two main reasons for this.

It can never be said that a theory is true but that it is the best available. It is possible then, through this inductive process, to develop a grounded theory.

The difference between values and logic in a paradigm A paradigm of inquiry, like any another intellectual construct, is based on logically unprovable assumptions, i. Neither is it possible to argue that one set of methods is more logical than another. In this way, practical accounts can give rise to theoretical considerations.

The human mind is "hard wired" to comprehend certain principles which must exist and are therefore, real, a priori, and absolutely true. Logical consequences for scientific method of these assumptions.“action research” is that there are different types of action research depending upon the participants involved.

A plan of research can involve a single teacher investigating an issue in his or her classroom, a group of teachers working on a common problem, or a team of teachers and others.

Chapter Three: Research Methodology Introduction The way in which research is conducted may be conceived of in terms of the research philosophy subscribed to, the research strategy employed and so the research instruments utilised (and perhaps developed) in the pursuit of a goal - the Discussion and Rationale for Choice of Approach.

Action research resources at Southern Cross University, a set of resource files which support an on-line course in action research A group planning process which can be used to develop a detailed action plan, including a plan for monitoring the success of the plan A naive philosophy of action research (22k) A pragmatic (and probably.

Keywords: action research critique, action research disadvantages The use of action research in higher education is growing (Mertler, ). Action research involves a systematic inquiry wherein educators can utilize their knowledge as practitioners to change and improve educational practices (Kemmis, ;.

Research design, which I refer to as the plan or proposal the intersection of philosophy, strategies of inquiry, and specific methods. A framework that I use to explain the inter-action of these three components is seen in Figure To reiterate, in I suggest that individuals preparing a research proposal or plan.

Action research: understanding its philosophy can improve your practice. Pam Swepson. This is a resource file which supports the regular public program "areol" (action research and evaluation on line) offered twice a year beginning in mid-February and mid-July.

Download
A discussion on research philosophy and plan of action
Rated 5/5 based on 38 review