It has allowed devolution in a country that is ever-changing, so the constitution can be changed unlike in a codified constitution. Get Full Essay Get access to this section to get all help you need with your essay and educational issues.
This is an advantage, because in countries such as the UK without a codified constitution, they provide too much power to their political party in charge and to their individual prime minister under their systems; this means that power is not widely dispersed and is held in too few hands.
Some may also say that constitutions should be able to evolve by themselves as it is organic; therefore, the laws should be able to change and evolve with time. Furthermore, many politicians in the UK argue that many of the public are disengaged in politics and have a lack of political understanding.
To conclude, I disagree that the advantages of a codified constitution outweigh the disadvantages as a constitution should be allowed to evolve by itself and over time with the times, not just be rigid and inadaptable as in a codified constitution.
On the other hand, a disadvantage of a codified constitution is that they are inflexible to change which can lead to radical actions against the government and even political inequalities such as the Civil Rights Movement.
Some would say that, yes, there are more advantages of a codified constitution than disadvantages. Also, the checks and balances on the government can be too strong and too severe which can lead to gridlock of the government such as the US Congress.
Also, constitutions can rapidly fall out of date and therefore a codified constitution is inadaptable and difficult to change with time; which is why many states periodically rewrite their constitution. Furthermore, a codified constitution would not please the whole of the democracy and cause further divisions as people may not agree with the fundamental laws of the country placed on one authoritative document.
Another advantage of a codified constitution is entrenchment which means that the fundamental principles of the constitution are protected, such as the right to trial before a jury.
I will explore both the advantages and disadvantages of a codified constitution in this essay. If they disagree with any laws on the codified constitution, they can challenge government by either lobbying or even establishing pressure groups which would strengthen the democracy.
Under entrenchment, there is a separation of powers which restricts the amount of power one specific political party has and the damage it can do the constitution whilst in power. Whereas the USA has a codified constitution and is in a constant state of gridlock and chaos as checks and balances and separation of powers can be overridden and prevent necessary enforcement of acts such as the Civil Rights Movement in the s.
Looking at the UK as an example of a country with an uncodified constitution, there may be no need for them to change to a codified constitution as they have been quite strong and stable under the current constitution.
More essays like this: Therefore, everyone who belongs to the constitution is fully aware of its meanings and obligations. Therefore, high authority and special political powers are required to amend the codified constitution. Its adversary is an uncodified constitution, where rules, laws and principles are not in one authoritative document, but are found in a variety of sources which may be written or unwritten.
As a result, this can protect the constitution from any new law which may endanger it.Essay about The Arguments For and Against a Codified Constitution Words | 5 Pages.
Arguments For and Against a Codified Constitution A constitution is a set of rules that seek to establish the duties, powers and functions of the various institutions of government, regulate the relationships between them, and define the relationship between the state and the individual.
‘The advantages of a codified constitution now outweigh its disadvantages’. Discuss There are various advantages to having a codified constitution, especially in the modern climate of security fears that could have on the citizens’ civil liberties.
The Advantages and Disadvantages of an Unwritten Constitution in the UK The UK has an unwritten constitution unlike the U.S.A. Instead Britain's laws, policies and codes are developed through statutes, common law, convention and more recently E.U law.
The unwritten constitution has worked for the UK and even though minor changes are inevitable, it remains more practical than the codified constitution. Summary Constitutions are responsible for defining and regulating state institutions, which guide the state’s relationship with individual citizens.
A codified constitution is a set of rules that seeks to establish duties, powers and functions of various different institutions of government.
They're there to regulate the relationship between and among the constitutions, defining the relationship between the state and the individual.
A codified /5(3). A written constitution clearly defines the division of powers within a government, the powers and limitations of each branch therein, and the rights of the citizens at large. Written constitutions also allow literate citizens the opportunity to familiarize themselves with their government's laws and.Download